Pro- and anti-gay-marriage propaganda

The original version of this did not have the bad language bleeped out, but this one is still NSFW because, well, you’ll see why I am linking rather than embedding it if you listen….


Here is the response from the National Organization for Marriage:

Help Stop Radical SSM Activists Obscenity-Laden Attempt to Corrupt our Children

Both of these contain propaganda techniques which make me less likely to accept their messages, but on the whole I prefer the second one.


About Polymath

Discoverable with effort
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Pro- and anti-gay-marriage propaganda

  1. Anonymous Crab says:

    I love the OMG WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN attitude in the crybaby NOM video. Maybe, just maybe, the children wouldn’t be so upset if the NOM people weren’t attempting opposed to the EXISTENCE of their family structures? Whatever.

  2. Alvis Velthomer says:

    Why am I not surprised that AnonymousCrab is butt-hurt about propaganda against butt-plugger “rights”. Why do you post on a reactionary blog to begin with?

  3. Polymath says:

    Alvis, you need to use more moderate language. And this is not a “reactionary blog”, it is a blog about what interests me, only a small part of which could be characterized as ” reactionary”. And A.Crab is a personal friend for whom I have high intellectual respect, even though I disagree with him on many things. I need more people like him here, not fewer.

  4. Alvis Velthomer says:

    I am not apologizing for a crime that was non-existant 20 years ago.

    However, if you want me to bite my sharpened tongue I will do so.

    I just find it hilarious that the hyperbole of yesterday become the tolerance of the present.

    Another example of this would be someone demanding an “english only” law as being a “xenophobe”, racist, nazi, Yet 30 years ago, if one were to have demanded such, there would have been no controversy.

    Things that were absolutely unthinkable in terms of being accepted by society only a few decades ago are now being DEMANDED to be accepted or else risk ostracism and insult.

    My bluntness is merely the mindset of a person who has not gotten the memo that the borders of sanity have been m0ved. I react to such things as a person in most other societies would react. Even the high IQ secular Chinese react with disgust to homosexual activities.

    Ironically, its only the countries that have been historically “Christian” that have had the most gains in regards to homosexual rights, which shows Christianity has become little more than sexually restrictive liberalism which is why it has basically been steamrolled and in retreat throughout the entire West.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s