Crashing the system

People don’t appreciate how since the 1960’s leftists in America have explicitly and unashamedly desired to sabotage the American economy and fiscal system and make it unsustainable, in order to foment revolutionary change. The very same old lefties are at it again.

This article by Ron Radosh,

Frances Fox Piven Calls for a new Cloward-Piven Strategy for Today

shows how Piven and the editors at The Nation magazine are calling for “disruptive” protests, strikes, and riots, using recent unrest in Greece and Britain as a model.

Some have speculated that Obama actually wants to make things worse in order to facilitate a socialist takeover, but I don’t believe this. He will disappoint the Left just like he disappointed everyone else. But it’s instructive to see again how much the American Left hates America. Somehow, though, radicals like Piven and Obama’s mentor Bill Ayers remain prominent in American society. A country with a proper sociopolitical immune system would have tarred and feathered such traitors decades ago.

Advertisements

About Polymath

Discoverable with effort
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Crashing the system

  1. rebelliousvanilla says:

    This is what I admire about Belarus – it told Soros, Piven and their ilk to go F themselves and shut their crap down. By the way, all the NGOs that I know, the major ones are tied to fostering non-sense such as this. This is why as an empress, I’d shut all of them down. What I find amusing are the NGOs who get governmental funding.

    Anyway, most of the protests in Europe have the same leftists behind them that want to do them there too. I’m always amused by politicians in my country organizing strikes and stuff like that. I didn’t even know that this is the purpose of politicians. God, I hate democracy. The problem isn’t even socialism to begin with, it is democracy, universal suffrage and their like.

  2. rebelliousvanilla says:

    And by the way, the problem isn’t undermining one’s economy. The problem is that the US had all her institutions degraded. And this is how Marxism achieved total victory over America. And yes, it has been a total victory.

    What I’m amused about the freedoms is how people want freedom of speech, but then expect people to publish only traditional things(which was the case historically for us). Then we allowed our enemies free speech, while they tried to shut us up. Every single person who isn’t willing to do total war against their enemy deserves to lose.

  3. Alvis Velthomer says:

    Somehow, though, radicals like Piven and Obama’s mentor Bill Ayers remain prominent in American society. A country with a proper sociopolitical immune system would have tarred and feathered such traitors decades ago.

    Maxim on Western Politics:
    A left-wing radical will eventually be considered a left-wing moderate even if he does not change his positions. A right-wing moderate will eventually become a “neo-nazi” if he never changes his positions over time.

    That is how Ayers and Pliven are today esteemed intellectuals whereas people like Sailer are regulated to blogging.

  4. Workshy Joe says:

    Left-wing? Right-wing? What’s the difference?

    They both want huge government, high taxes, mega-regulation, fiat money, central banking and endless war.

  5. PA says:

    They both want huge government, high taxes, mega-regulation, fiat money, central banking and endless war.

    Don’t forget the biggest one: population replacement.

  6. Polymath says:

    PA, that is indeed the biggest one, and I think it is very important to raise awareness by using that 2-word phrase “population replacement” at every opportunity. That is the taboo, the single concept which our true enemies most dread even entering people’s minds as a concept, regardless of any value judgments attached to it. It must be made literally unthinkable. This explains a great deal of otherwise puzzling liberal hysteria and illogic.

    Population replacement. Explain the concept to everyone you know.

  7. rebelliousvanilla says:

    Polymath, I use an even better word. Ethnic cleansing.

  8. Polymath says:

    It’s not necessary to complicate things with the ethnic angle, forcing American citizens to accept new ones is stealing their birthright whatever the ethnicity of the newcomers. If I made you share your house with a stranger you’d still mind it even if the stranger was Romanian.

    “Ethnic cleansing” also, historically, means removing people not just changing the mix. But rhetorically you make a good point, for some people using the term “ethnic cleansing” may wake them up even quicker than using the term “population replacement” would.

  9. damiansergiu says:

    Polymath, the way I see it, English people are 10% of births in London. This means that in 50 years, they will be under 10% of the population.

  10. Workshy Joe says:

    @PA:

    I think the powers-that-be are very good at playing national and ethnic groups off against each other. Its a big part of their Modus Operandi.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s